The parity core of Louboutin's Conjecture 4.1, and a Möbius unit lemma #
Let M ∈ M₂(ℤ) with M³ = ε·1 (ε = ±1), M ≠ ±1, and let F = X³ − aX²Y + bXY² − cY³ satisfy
F ∘ M = ±F. Then c and a + b are odd, and X³ − aX² + bX − c has no root modulo 2. The
proof: det M = 1 and tr M is odd (Cayley–Hamilton), so M mod 2 is one of the two elements
of order 3 of GL₂(𝔽₂) and permutes ℙ¹(𝔽₂) cyclically; F(1, 0) = 1 forces F odd at
(0, 1) and (1, 1) (a finite check by decide).
Not formalized here: that the Möbius matrix of σ lies in GL₂(ℤ) when ℤ[σα] = ℤ[α]
(Bérczes–Evertse–Győry, Lemma 6.4), which is the input of cubic_parity, and Dedekind's
criterion.
Main results #
Louboutin.CubicParity.cubic_parity,Louboutin.CubicParity.no_root_mod_two.Louboutin.CubicParity.mobius_unit: ifβ(rα + s) = pα + qthen(rα + s)(p − rβ) = ps − qr, a unit ifps − qr = ±1.
References #
- A. Bérczes, J.-H. Evertse and K. Győry, Multiply monogenic orders, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 12 (2013), 467–497.
- S. R. Louboutin, When is the order generated by a cubic, quartic or quintic algebraic unit Galois invariant: three conjectures, Czechoslovak Math. J. 70 (2020), 905–919, doi:10.21136/CMJ.2020.0019-19.
- C. Marín, Orders generated by conjugates of Galois quartic integers, preprint (2026).
The mod-2 core: a matrix over 𝔽₂ with det 1 and trace 1 (an element of order 3 of GL₂(𝔽₂)), fixing the cubic form F at the three points (1,0), (0,1), (1,1) of ℙ¹(𝔽₂), forces F(0,1) = c ≠ 0 and F(1,1) ≠ 0, i.e. c = 1 and a + b = 1.
Cubic parity core of Prop. prop:c41 (Louboutin's Conjecture 4.1 without the BEG13
step): if M ∈ M₂(ℤ), M³ = ±1, M ≠ ±1 and F∘M = ±F for F = X³ − aX²Y + bXY² − cY³, then
c and a + b are odd.
If moreover ps − qr = ±1, then rα + s is a unit (so β = (pα + q)/(rα + s) ∈ ℤ[α] when p, q, r, s are integers and β(rα + s) = pα + q).