Integrality of periods on spin four-manifolds #
Arithmetic certificates for the quantization of couplings p A + q B + r C whose three periods
A, B, C run over ℤ on a general four-manifold, while on a spin four-manifold the
intersection form is even, so that the third period runs over 2ℤ. The geometric realization of
the period triples and the evenness of the intersection pairing are inputs, not formalized. t
is a common denominator in applications (nonzero); the statements remain valid as divisibility
statements at t = 0.
Main results #
universal_basis,spin_basis: the periods lie int ℤifft ∣ p, q, r, respectivelyt ∣ p, q, 2r.universal_implies_spin,half_square_spin,half_square_not_universal: the spin condition is strictly weaker.q6_congruence,q6_implies_six: for theq = 6row of Table 1 of Choi–Forslund–Lam–Shao (withA = c₂(E₂),B = c₂(E₃),C = c₁(E₃)²and mathematical sign conventions for Chern classes) the spin condition is18 K₂ + 24 K₃ + K₁ ≡ 0 (mod 36), and it forces6 ∣ K₁.
References #
- Y. Choi, M. Forslund, H. T. Lam, S.-H. Shao, Quantization of axion-gauge couplings and non-invertible higher symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 121601, arXiv:2309.03937, Table 1.
theorem
AxionCouplings.SpinPeriod.universal_implies_spin
(p q r t : ℤ)
(h : universalPeriods p q r t)
:
spinPeriods p q r t
The general condition implies the spin condition.
Half of the square satisfies the spin condition.
Half of the square does not satisfy the general condition.