Paper models
Four models somebody else published, taken off their pages and run through this instrument's engine.
Control names are kept as they appear in the application. Start with a reference, change one input at a time, and retain the assumptions with your result.
What this tool is for
Use this to begin from a named published construction and see which of its statements the laboratory can actually reproduce. The reference table separates boundary and zero-mode information from potential calculations. The Maru–Nago experiment is an additional supported SU(6) potential study with its own guide.
First steps
- Use the Maru–Nago shortcut for Type 2/3 SU(6), the magnified minimum and Fourier convergence; its button transfers the supported bulk potential to the builder.
- Pick one of the four; Kubo–Lim–Yamashita carries a dial, the number of triplet fermions.
- Read the table: what the paper prints, then what this returns, then the verdict.
- Press Load into the SU(N) builder and walk the spectrum, the ledger and the simulator on their model.
Controls and inputs
| Control | Meaning | Try this |
|---|---|---|
| Model selector | Chooses one of the four archived model comparisons. | Read the source and supported comparison scope immediately after selection. |
| Triplet-fermion count, where available | Changes the matter input in the Kubo–Lim–Yamashita example. | Compare two counts while retaining the same boundary conditions. |
| Load into the SU(N) builder | Transfers the supported boundary and bulk input for further inspection. | Open 4D spectrum after loading and compare the supported zero-mode statement. |
| Maru–Nago shortcut | Opens the separate Type 2 / Type 3 experiment. | Read its convergence study before transferring its bulk potential. |
Reading the results
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Printed statement / computed result / verdict | Compares a specific source claim with the laboratory result and retains the source's equation or table reference. |
| Explanation rows | Describe normalization, implementation scope or disagreements that a short status label cannot explain. |
| Transferred model | Contains only the supported input; additional interactions of the original construction may remain outside the builder. |
Three of the four are supersymmetric and this engine's potential is not, so their rows are boundary-condition and zero-mode statements only. An amber row disagrees with one printed equation, not with a paper, and names which of that paper's own equations agrees with which.
Worked example
Reproduce one statement from a paper
- Select a published model and read its scope note.
- Choose a boundary or zero-mode row with an explicit source reference.
- Load the model into the builder and inspect the corresponding spectrum.
- Read any discrepancy at the level of the named statement.
What to expect: You can trace one comparison from source to input to output without treating it as a reproduction of every part of the paper.
Scope and limitations
- Three archived models are supersymmetric while the builder potential is not; their stated comparisons are limited to supported boundary and zero-mode information.
- A disagreement with one printed equation is not a blanket judgement about an entire paper.
- Transferred bulk data do not automatically include brane interactions, supersymmetric cancellations or flavour completion.
If something is unclear
A comparison is amber or limited in scope.
Read the explanatory row and the cited equation before changing a normalization to make numbers agree.
Terms used here
Sources and attribution
Current instrument guide. Archived editions retain their own scope.
Back to top