GHU Lab

User guide

Search the GHU Lab guides by task or model family: controls, worked examples, assumptions and source attribution.

Choose a task

Browse by family

Start here

SU(7) · Komori–Maru

  • Menu section

    Hierarchy

    Calculate a compactification scale and Higgs mass for a chosen SU(7) bulk content, and compare the moment approximation with the implemented full Fourier potential.

  • Menu section

    Design a scale

    Search for integer bulk contents compatible with a target compactification scale and Higgs-mass window under the displayed SU(7) moment conventions.

  • Menu section

    Count a rung

    Count supported SU(7) bulk contents at selected moment coordinates without having to list every content individually.

  • Menu section

    Atlas

    Browse the 1,286 supported SU(7) bulk contents with at most five multiplets, compare their potential shapes and load an example into the model.

  • Menu section

    Same potential?

    Compare two SU(7) bulk contents using the full-potential coordinates, and distinguish equal potentials from equal low-order moments.

  • Embedded experiment

    Hypotheses: local response and experimental context

    Compare nine recalibrated GHU benchmarks and inspect a separate CMS spectrum with its covariance. Each selection includes a reading of the calculated values and their scope.

  • Menu section

    Anomalies & proton

    Inspect the SU(7) bulk anomaly contributions and the boundary matter needed to cancel them; the separate RS experiment studies another model's anomaly flow.

  • Menu section

    Escape from proton decay

    Construct the supported SU(7) boundary-matter assignments and check their anomaly cancellation and proton-protection selection rules separately.

  • Menu section

    Multiplets & parities

    Inspect how supported SU(7) representations split under the boundary symmetries, and how their parity signs determine zero modes and potential terms.

  • Menu section

    Screen a table

    Arithmetic screens for a published row, with conditional rung certificates and independent full-potential witness checks.

  • Menu section

    Collider

    Which state a dijet search bounds, plus a separate Higgs-rate scenario checked against pinned experimental datasets.

  • Embedded experiment

    Higgs rates, total width and experimental comparisons

    Construct an explicit CP-even Higgs scenario at 125.2 GeV and inspect production, widths, branching fractions and matching external experimental results.

  • Embedded experiment

    First KK gluon at the LHC: couplings, widths, tt̄ / dijet limits and the m(tt̄) spectrum

    Compute the first KK gluon of flat GHU (√2 g_s to every quark) or of a warped extra dimension (zero-mode quarks of bulk mass c), its widths and branching fractions, and compare its leading-order σ × BR with the ATLAS tt̄ and CMS dijet limits as r = prediction / limit. Then compute the m(tt̄) spectrum with the interference between the KK gluon and the QCD gluon, in the bins of the CMS parton-level measurement, and the expected Δχ² against its covariance.

  • Embedded experiment

    RS anomaly flow and baryon current

    Inspect UV and IR anomaly factors from normalized Z-tower wavefunctions and compare gauge cancellation with the baryon-current anomaly.

SU(4) · AHMN

  • Menu section

    Selection rule

    Check the supported SU(4) representation and Wilson-domain selection conditions, including the chiral-count test for a quark-generation embedding.

  • Menu section

    Model calculator

    Evaluate the supported SU(4) one-loop potential, locate its vacuum and calculate the associated Higgs curvature for a chosen matter content.

  • Menu section

    eta-meter

    Compare the analytic and directly evaluated response of supported SU(4) multiplets to their boundary sign η.

Flat 5D models

  • Menu section

    Five dimensions

    Evaluate the supported Haba–Yamashita five-dimensional SU(3) example and compare its potential, located vacuum and Kaluza–Klein spectrum.

  • Menu section

    SU(N) builder

    Build a supported five-dimensional SU(N) model on S¹/Z₂ from boundary blocks and bulk matter, then inspect its one-loop potential and vacuum.

  • Menu section

    Paper models

    Four models somebody else published, taken off their pages and run through this instrument's engine.

  • Embedded experiment

    Maru–Nago SU(6): families and the Wilson minimum

    Reproduce the supported Type 2 / Type 3 bulk Wilson potential and compare its minimum with the published table and an independent infinite-sum calculation.

  • Menu section

    4D spectrum

    What the model on the builder CONTAINS: the four-dimensional fields and their Kaluza–Klein towers.

  • Menu section

    Anomalies

    What that content owes: every anomaly channel of the unbroken group, in exact rationals.

  • Menu section

    Brane matter

    Who pays that bill, and what it costs: matter on the two fixed points, held at once to the anomaly ledger and to Part I's boundary-mass gate.

  • Menu section

    Scan

    Search a bounded set of supported 5D SU(N) boundary conditions and bulk contents through selected group, Higgs, chirality, anomaly and vacuum filters.

  • Menu section

    One model, every verdict

    Compare supported model diagnostics across gauge-equivalent boundary descriptions and identify which results remain unchanged in that comparison.

  • Menu section

    Simulator

    Choose among three distinct calculation modes: the 5D builder model, a top-KK Higgs-production reference, or the 4D neutrino-ring research model.

  • Simulator mode

    Simulator: 5D builder predictions

    Convert the supported SU(N) builder vacuum into dimensionful masses and compare specified model quantities with named reference measurements.

Neutrino ring

Higgs and thermal diagnostics

Boundary conditions

  • Menu section

    Boundary conditions

    Group supported orbifold boundary conditions into equivalence classes and compare their apparent symmetries under the stated ordinary-boundary relation.

  • Menu section

    Classify an orbifold

    Derive supported orbifold classification data from an integer rotation matrix, then compare the SU, SO and Sp cases under the stated hypotheses.

  • Menu section

    Name the relations

    Which equivalence relation on boundary conditions the literature already owns, and whether a proposed move set connects a class.

  • Menu section

    Conjugate boundary conditions

    Compare conjugate boundary conditions on S¹/Z₂ under two explicit hypotheses about the allowed transformations at the endpoints.

  • Embedded experiment

    Boundary research: spectra, profiles, anomalies and certified response

    Separate tests help investigate a proposed GHU boundary mechanism: roots of a flat fermion boundary problem, the numerical rank of overlapping profiles, exact parity-inserted spinor traces and a restricted six-dimensional SU(2) tensor condition. The fifth compares two wall profiles after common pole and residue matching, using replayed continuum certificates. The sixth counts finite neutral-complex classes on exact strata. Section 6b adds a continuous mass enclosure and isolation test for the light neutral vector at three exact Wilson angles.

Boundary terms, gravity and literature

  • Menu section

    Brane kinetic terms

    What happens to the tower when brane-localised kinetic terms make the masses stop being n/R.

  • Embedded experiment

    Warped SU(6): running and UV boundary terms

    Calculate two independent inverse-coupling differences and the UV boundary terms required for the supported warped SU(6) assignments.

  • Menu section

    Gravity–gauge · 3D

    Which physical information a complete tower of masses leaves undetermined in a controlled gravity-gauge example.

  • Menu section

    The literature

    The reading list behind the series: what each paper publishes, and which ones a person has actually read.

  • Menu section

    Quantization and certificates

    Compare exact quantization criteria for H=S(U(2)×U(3)), closed spin-four periods, a conditional parent transfer and a joint U(2) example.

Current instrument guide. Archived editions retain their own scope.

Back to top